Pharmacodynamic characteristics of lixisenatide once daily versus liraglutide once daily in patients with type 2 diabetes insufficiently controlled on metformin.
Diabetes Obes Metab · 2013
Last updated 2026-05-28In a 28-day study of 148 people with type 2 diabetes on metformin, those taking lixisenatide before breakfast saw a much larger drop in blood sugar spikes after meals compared to those taking liraglutide (average reduction of 12.6 vs. 4.0 units). More lixisenatide users reached safe 2-hour blood sugar levels (69% vs. 29%), though liraglutide led to slightly better fasting blood sugar and weight loss. Lixisenatide also lowered post-meal insulin and glucagon more than liraglutide, with fewer side effects reported (55% vs. 65%).
AI summary of the abstract below.
| Journal | Diabetes Obes Metab, 2013 |
|---|---|
| Citations | 161 |
| Relative citation ratio | 5.49 |
| NIH percentile | 93 |
| Molecules | liraglutide, lixisenatide |
| Conditions studied | Type 2 Diabetes |
Abstract
AIM: Assess the pharmacodynamics of lixisenatide once daily (QD) versus liraglutide QD in type 2 diabetes insufficiently controlled on metformin.
METHODS: In this 28-day, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, multicentre study (NCT01175473), patients (mean HbA1c 7.3%) received subcutaneous lixisenatide QD (10 µg weeks 1-2, then 20 µg; n = 77) or liraglutide QD (0.6 mg week 1, 1.2 mg week 2, then 1.8 mg; n = 71) 30 min before breakfast. Primary endpoint was change in postprandial plasma glucose (PPG) exposure from baseline to day 28 during a breakfast test meal.
RESULTS: Lixisenatide reduced PPG significantly more than liraglutide [mean change in AUC(0:30-4:30h) : -12.6 vs. -4.0 h·mmol/L, respectively; p < 0.0001 (0:30 h = start of meal)]. Change in maximum PPG excursion was -3.9 mmol/l vs. -1.4 mmol/l, respectively (p < 0.0001). More lixisenatide-treated patients achieved 2-h PPG <7.8 mmol/l (69% vs. 29%). Changes in fasting plasma glucose were greater with liraglutide (-0.3 vs. -1.3 mmol/l, p < 0.0001). Lixisenatide provided greater decreases in postprandial glucagon (p < 0.05), insulin (p < 0.0001) and C-peptide (p < 0.0001). Mean HbA1c decreased in both treatment groups (from 7.2% to 6.9% with lixisenatide vs. 7.4% to 6.9% with liraglutide) as did body weight (-1.6 kg vs. -2.4 kg, respectively). Overall incidence of adverse events was lower with lixisenatide (55%) versus liraglutide (65%), with no serious events or hypoglycaemia reported.
CONCLUSIONS: Once daily prebreakfast lixisenatide provided a significantly greater reduction in PPG (AUC) during a morning test meal versus prebreakfast liraglutide. Lixisenatide provided significant decreases in postprandial insulin, C-peptide (vs. an increase with liraglutide) and glucagon, and better gastrointestinal tolerability than liraglutide.
Verbatim abstract via PubMed 23368510 ↗
Related research
- Liraglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes.
- A Randomized, Controlled Trial of 3.0 mg of Liraglutide in Weight Management.
- Lixisenatide in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Acute Coronary Syndrome.
- Liraglutide safety and efficacy in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (LEAN): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 2 study.
- Liraglutide and Renal Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes.
- Efficacy of Liraglutide for Weight Loss Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: The SCALE Diabetes Randomized Clinical Trial.
- The arcuate nucleus mediates GLP-1 receptor agonist liraglutide-dependent weight loss.
- Effect of Weekly Subcutaneous Semaglutide vs Daily Liraglutide on Body Weight in Adults With Overweight or Obesity Without Diabetes: The STEP 8 Randomized Clinical Trial.