GLPwatch

Effects on Subclinical Heart Failure in Type 2 Diabetic Subjects on Liraglutide Treatment vs. Glimepiride Both in Combination with Metformin: A Randomized Open Parallel-Group Study.

Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) · 2017

Last updated 2026-09-04

In a study of 62 people with type 2 diabetes and early heart issues, those taking liraglutide (1.8 mg daily) for 18 weeks did not show better heart function improvement compared to those taking glimepiride (4 mg daily). However, liraglutide users lost an average of 3.7 kg in body weight, while glimepiride users lost only 0.2 kg. Liraglutide also increased heart rate by 6.3 beats per minute, whereas glimepiride slightly decreased it by 2.3 beats per minute.

AI summary of the abstract below.

JournalFront Endocrinol (Lausanne), 2017
Citations17
Relative citation ratio0.59
NIH percentile34
Molecules liraglutide

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate the effect of liraglutide treatment on heart function in type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients with subclinical heart failure. METHODS: Randomized open parallel-group trial. 62 T2D patients (45 male) with subclinical heart failure were randomized to either once daily liraglutide 1.8 mg, or glimepiride 4 mg, both add on to metformin 1 g twice a day. Mitral annular systolic (s') and early diastolic (e') velocities were measured at rest and during bicycle ergometer exercise, using tissue Doppler echocardiography. The primary endpoint was 18-week treatment changes in longitudinal functional reserve index (LFRI). RESULTS: Clinical characteristics between groups (liraglutide = 33 vs. glimepiride = 29) were well matched. At baseline left ventricle ejection fraction (53.7 vs. 53.6%) and global longitudinal strain (-15.3 vs. -16.5%) did not differ between groups. There were no significant differences in mitral flow velocities between groups. For the primary endpoint, there was no treatment change [95% confidence interval] for: LFRI (-0.18 vs. -0.53 [-0.28, 2.59;  = 0.19]), or LFRI (-0.10 vs. -0.18 [-1.0, 1.7;  = 0.54]); for the secondary endpoints, there was a significant treatment change in respect of body weight (-3.7 vs. -0.2 kg [-5.5, -1.4;  = 0.001]), waist circumference (-3.1 vs. -0.8 cm [-4.2, -0.4;  = 0.019]), and heart rate (HR) (6.3 vs. -2.3 bpm [-3.0, 14.2;  = 0.003]), with no such treatment change in hemoglobin A1c levels (-11.0 vs. -9.2 mmol/mol [-7.0, 2.6;  = 0.37]), between groups. CONCLUSION: 18-week treatment of liraglutide compared with glimepiride did not improve LFRI, but however increased HR. There was a significant treatment change in body weight reduction in favor for liraglutide treatment.

Verbatim abstract via PubMed 29184539 ↗

Related research