A case for screening real-world data for collateral drug benefits: Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists and bile acid diarrhea.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf · 2024
Last updated 2026-05-28A study tested whether real-world data could detect benefits of GLP-1 drugs (like liraglutide) for bile acid diarrhea, similar to findings from a clinical trial. Using data from 158 people, researchers found that the likelihood of starting a GLP-1 drug before or after bile acid sequestrants was nearly equal (ratio of 0.96), with results close to those of the trial when looking at specific drugs like liraglutide (ratio of 0.75) or semaglutide (ratio of 1.23).
AI summary of the abstract below.
| Journal | Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf, 2024 |
|---|---|
| Citations | 5 |
| Relative citation ratio | 1.49 |
| NIH percentile | 64 |
| Molecules | — |
Abstract
PURPOSE: Collateral drug benefits are hitherto unknown beneficial effects that might lead to repurposing of already marketed drugs. A randomized controlled trial has found liraglutide to be non-inferior to colesevelam in reducing bile acid diarrhea. We hypothesized that this collateral drug benefit of liraglutide could have been detected using observational data.
METHODS: We performed a sequence symmetry analysis (SSA). In the SSA, we indexed individuals on the date of the first prescription of GLP1-RA and restricted the analysis to all individuals who had a first prescription of bile acid sequestrants between 365 days prior to until 365 days after the index date. Sequence ratios (SR), that is, the ratio between counts of persons initiating GLP1-RA first versus last, were calculated, and 95% confidence intervals were obtained. We adjusted for prescribing trends using null-effect SR adjustment.
RESULTS: We included 158 individuals, with a median age of 58 years. The trend-adjusted SR was 0.96 (95% confidence interval 0.70-1.31). When stratifying on the type of GLP1-RA (liraglutide or semaglutide), we found results compatible with the previous trial (SR 0.75, 0.51-1.10 and SR 1.23, 0.80-1.89). Since BAS also can be used as a cholesterol lowering drug, we repeated the main analysis while excluded statin users, resulting in a stronger association (SR 0.56, 0.33-0.96).
CONCLUSION: Using the SSA methodology, we obtained estimates of a collateral drug benefit that were compatible with trial results. These results support the use of epidemiological analyses of observational data as instrument for detecting collateral drug benefits.
Verbatim abstract via PubMed 37559355 ↗