Efficacy and Safety of a Biosimilar Liraglutide (Melitide<sup>®</sup>) Versus the Reference Liraglutide (Victoza<sup>®</sup>) in People with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Noninferiority Clinical Trial.
Diabetes Ther · 2023
Last updated 2026-08-28| Journal | Diabetes Ther, 2023 |
|---|---|
| Citations | 8 |
| Relative citation ratio | 0.91 |
| NIH percentile | 47 |
| Molecules | liraglutide |
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Liraglutide effectively controls blood glucose level and reduces body weight. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of a biosimilar liraglutide (Melitide; CinnaGen, Tehran, Iran) to the reference liraglutide (Victoza; Novo Nordisk, Bagsvaerd, Denmark) in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).
METHODS: In this phase 3 clinical noninferiority trial, adult patients with inadequately controlled T2DM and with hemoglobin A (HbA) levels of 7-10.5% on at least two oral glucose-lowering drugs with stable doses for at least 3 months were randomized to receive Melitide (n = 150) or Victoza (n = 150) 1.8 mg/day for 26 weeks. The primary outcome was assessment of the noninferiority of Melitide to Victoza in terms of change in HbA level with a prespecified margin of 0.4%. The secondary outcomes were the assessment of additional efficacy parameters (including the proportion of patients achieving HbA levels of < 7%), the incidence of adverse events, and immunogenicity.
RESULTS: Of the 300 participants enrolled in this study, 235 were included in the per-protocol analysis (112 in the Melitide group and 123 in the Victoza group). The mean (standard deviation) changes in HbA were - 1.76% (1.22) in the Melitide group and - 1.59% (1.31) in the Victoza group. The upper limit of the 95% one-sided confidence interval (CI) of the mean difference between Melitide and Victoza in lowering HbA was lower than the predefined margin (mean difference - 0.18, 95% CI - 0.5 to 0.15). Similar findings were obtained with the intention-to-treat analysis. No statistically significant differences were observed between the two study arms regarding the proportion of patients achieving HbA < 7% (p = 0.210), other efficacy parameters (p > 0.05), and reported adverse events (p = 0.916). Furthermore, none of the patients developed anti-liraglutide antibodies.
CONCLUSION: The biosimilar liraglutide (Melitide) was noninferior in efficacy and comparable in safety when compared with the reference liraglutide.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03421119.
Verbatim abstract via PubMed 37707701 ↗
Related research
- Liraglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes.
- A Randomized, Controlled Trial of 3.0 mg of Liraglutide in Weight Management.
- Liraglutide safety and efficacy in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (LEAN): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 2 study.
- Liraglutide and Renal Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes.
- Efficacy of Liraglutide for Weight Loss Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: The SCALE Diabetes Randomized Clinical Trial.
- The arcuate nucleus mediates GLP-1 receptor agonist liraglutide-dependent weight loss.
- Effect of Weekly Subcutaneous Semaglutide vs Daily Liraglutide on Body Weight in Adults With Overweight or Obesity Without Diabetes: The STEP 8 Randomized Clinical Trial.
- The Discovery and Development of Liraglutide and Semaglutide.