GLPwatch

Efficacy and Safety of a Biosimilar Liraglutide (Melitide<sup>®</sup>) Versus the Reference Liraglutide (Victoza<sup>®</sup>) in People with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Noninferiority Clinical Trial.

Diabetes Ther · 2023

Last updated 2026-08-28
JournalDiabetes Ther, 2023
Citations8
Relative citation ratio0.91
NIH percentile47
Molecules liraglutide

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Liraglutide effectively controls blood glucose level and reduces body weight. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of a biosimilar liraglutide (Melitide; CinnaGen, Tehran, Iran) to the reference liraglutide (Victoza; Novo Nordisk, Bagsvaerd, Denmark) in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). METHODS: In this phase 3 clinical noninferiority trial, adult patients with inadequately controlled T2DM and with hemoglobin A (HbA) levels of 7-10.5% on at least two oral glucose-lowering drugs with stable doses for at least 3 months were randomized to receive Melitide (n = 150) or Victoza (n = 150) 1.8 mg/day for 26 weeks. The primary outcome was assessment of the noninferiority of Melitide to Victoza in terms of change in HbA level with a prespecified margin of 0.4%. The secondary outcomes were the assessment of additional efficacy parameters (including the proportion of patients achieving HbA levels of < 7%), the incidence of adverse events, and immunogenicity. RESULTS: Of the 300 participants enrolled in this study, 235 were included in the per-protocol analysis (112 in the Melitide group and 123 in the Victoza group). The mean (standard deviation) changes in HbA were - 1.76% (1.22) in the Melitide group and - 1.59% (1.31) in the Victoza group. The upper limit of the 95% one-sided confidence interval (CI) of the mean difference between Melitide and Victoza in lowering HbA was lower than the predefined margin (mean difference - 0.18, 95% CI - 0.5 to 0.15). Similar findings were obtained with the intention-to-treat analysis. No statistically significant differences were observed between the two study arms regarding the proportion of patients achieving HbA < 7% (p = 0.210), other efficacy parameters (p > 0.05), and reported adverse events (p = 0.916). Furthermore, none of the patients developed anti-liraglutide antibodies. CONCLUSION: The biosimilar liraglutide (Melitide) was noninferior in efficacy and comparable in safety when compared with the reference liraglutide. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03421119.

Verbatim abstract via PubMed 37707701 ↗

Related research