GLPwatch

Comparative effectiveness of semaglutide <i>versus</i> liraglutide, dulaglutide or tirzepatide: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Front Pharmacol · 2025

Last updated 2026-05-28

A review of 16 studies involving 5,997 patients found that semaglutide was more effective than liraglutide at lowering blood sugar levels (measured by HbA1c) by 0.56%. Compared to dulaglutide, semaglutide also reduced blood sugar levels (by 3.72%) and fasting blood sugar (by 2.66 mg/dL). However, tirzepatide was slightly better than semaglutide at lowering blood sugar levels (by 0.45%). Switching from liraglutide to semaglutide led to additional weight loss of 2.48% and a fasting blood sugar reduction of 10.76 mg/dL.

AI summary of the abstract below.

JournalFront Pharmacol, 2025
Citations10
Relative citation ratio4.06
Molecules semaglutide, tirzepatide, liraglutide, dulaglutide
Conditions studied Type 2 Diabetes, Obesity, Cardiovascular Risk Reduction, Chronic Kidney Disease, Mash, Obstructive Sleep Apnea, Pcos, Heart Failure

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study seeks to compare the effectiveness of Semaglutide compared to Liraglutide, Dulaglutide, or Tirzepatide. Additionally, it aims to investigate the implications of transitioning from Dulaglutide or Liraglutide to Semaglutide. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, and Web of Science (ClinicalTrials.gov for unpublished records) from their inception to 5 February 2025, including observational cohort studies and randomized controlled trials. Analyses were conducted using Review Manager (RevMan) version 5.4.1 and STATA 17. RESULTS: The meta-analysis comprised 16 studies and 5,997 patients. Semaglutide significantly reduced hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels compared to Liraglutide (0.56; 95% CI: 0.19-0.94; p < 0.001). However, no significant differences were observed between Semaglutide and Liraglutide in terms of fasting blood sugar (FBS), body mass index (BMI), and weight change. In comparison to Dulaglutide, Semaglutide displayed superior efficacy in reducing HbA1c levels (3.72; 95% CI: 0.02-7.41; p = 0.05) and FBS (2.66; 95% CI: 0.26-5.07; p = 0.03). However, no significant differences were found in weight and BMI change. Tirzepatide exhibited a notable advantage over Semaglutide in reducing HbA1c levels (-0.45; 95% CI: -0.88 to -0.02; p = 0.04). However, no clear superiority was observed for weight and FBS change. Transitions from Liraglutide to Semaglutide did not significantly impact HbA1c levels. However, weight loss (2.48; 95% CI: 0.45-4.51; p = 0.02) and reduced FBS levels (10.76; 95% CI: 0.55-20; p = 0.04) were observed. Transitioning from Dulaglutide to Semaglutide did not significantly affect HbA1c levels and weight change. CONCLUSION: While the precise source of heterogeneity remains elusive across most studies, analyses consistently demonstrate Semaglutide's superior efficacy compared to Liraglutide in reducing both HbA1c levels and weight. Moreover, it presents advantages over Dulaglutide, specifically in lowering FBS levels. However, Tirzepatide surpasses Semaglutide in its efficacy for reducing HbA1c levels.

Verbatim abstract via PubMed 40444045 ↗

Related research